Home / Doing Business in Malaysia / Business / Restructuring & closure

🧭 Practical ✓ Published: 22 Jul 2026 9 min read Next review 22 Jul 2027

Striking Off a Company Under Section 550

How SSM decides a striking-off application under section 550, the ten conditions in the Registrar's guidelines, the real notice clocks, and the seven-year reinstatement window under section 555.

30-second answer Reviewed 22 Jul 2026

Striking off is an administrative removal from the register under sections 549 to 551 of the Companies Act 2016. A director, member or liquidator applies under section 550 for RM100, and SSM will only proceed if the company has no assets, no liabilities, no charges, no outstanding penalties, no tax owing, no litigation, has made no return of capital, and is neither a holding company nor a guarantor corporation. Dissolution does not end director liability, and the company can be reinstated for seven years.

  • Section 550 is the application route; section 549 is the Registrar's own power, and section 549(a) — not carrying on business — is the only ground the guidelines cover
  • The Registrar applies ten conditions, and two of them quietly disqualify most active groups: no return of capital, and not a holding company
  • The statutory clocks are 30 days to show cause and 30 days after publication — not the three months most guides print
  • Fees are RM100 to apply, RM300 to object and RM500 to withdraw
  • Section 554 keeps every director, officer and member liable after dissolution as if the company still existed
  • Any aggrieved person has seven years to apply to Court to reinstate the company under section 555
  • The 2025 striking-off moratorium that waived the shareholders' resolution expired on 30 September 2025

Who this applies to: Directors and shareholders of a dormant or ceased Sdn Bhd, and anyone whose debtor has just been struck off the register.

On this page
Full explanation ≈9 min

Most people who ask how to strike off a company are really asking how to stop paying for one. That is a reasonable goal, and striking off is the cheapest way to reach it — RM100, no liquidator, no final accounts. It is also the route SSM rejects most often, because the ten conditions in the Registrar’s guidelines are stricter than the two or three that circulate online.

Who applies, and under what section?

Two sections do different jobs, and they get merged constantly.

Section 549 is the Registrar’s own power. He may strike a company off if it is not carrying on business or is not in operation, if it has contravened the Act, if it is being used for unlawful purposes, or in the winding-up situations in s.549(d) — no liquidator acting, or a liquidator six months in default on returns, or a court winding up that ran out of assets.

Section 550 is your route in. It provides that the Registrar may strike a company off “either on his own motion or upon an application by a director, member or liquidator of the company”. Note who is missing: a company secretary cannot apply in their own name, and neither can a creditor.

SSM’s guidelines are narrower still. They cover only s.549(a) — the company is not carrying on business or is not in operation. Every other limb of s.549 is the Registrar’s initiative, not yours.

The ten conditions SSM actually applies

Paragraph 5 of the guidelines (revised 19 April 2019) lists what the Registrar must be satisfied of. Two of them are the reason otherwise-clean applications fail.

#ConditionThe part that catches people
aShareholders’ resolution passed under s.290Majority consent must be evidenced; untraceable shareholders need proof of registered-post attempts
bNo assets and no liabilitiesManagement accounts must show it. If the last audited accounts showed assets, produce evidence of disposal and settlement
cNo outstanding charges in the Register of ChargesA satisfied loan that was never discharged under s.360 will stop you
dNo outstanding penalties or compounds under the ActSettle before applying, not during
eNo outstanding tax or liabilities with any government department or agencyA company that traded must obtain tax clearance before filing
fCompany information with the Registrar is up to dateDirector particulars must match the Registrar’s records
gNot involved in any legal proceeding, in or outside MalaysiaIncludes proceedings you know are impending
hNo return of capital to shareholdersIf capital is still there, the guidelines say to use voluntary winding up instead
iNot a holding companyA holding company must wind up voluntarily
jNot a guarantor corporationAny guarantee of third-party money disqualifies

Conditions (h) and (i) are the underexplained ones. If your Sdn Bhd still holds paid-up capital that has not been spent, you cannot simply distribute it and then strike off — the guidelines treat that as a return of capital and push you to a members’ voluntary winding up. And if the company owns shares in another company, it is a holding company, and the striking-off route closes.

A dormant subsidiary can still be struck off under paragraph 6, but only with a consent letter from the holding company on its letterhead (wholly-owned) or from all shareholders (otherwise), plus a declaration that neither company is subject to investigation or prosecution.

A company limited by guarantee must attach its latest audited financial statements under paragraph 7.

What it costs, and the clocks that actually run

StepFeeAuthority
Application to strike offRM100Item 27, Schedule of Fees, Companies Regulations 2017
Notice of intention to objectRM300Item 28
Notice of withdrawal of applicationRM500Item 29

Withdrawing costs five times what applying costs. Get the pre-conditions right before you file.

Most guides say SSM gives three months for objections. The Act says 30 days, twice. Under s.551(1) the Registrar may serve a notice stating that if cause to the contrary is not shown within thirty days, a public notification follows. Under s.551(2) he may strike the name off after thirty days from that publication, if the company confirms it is no longer operating, does not reply, attracts no objection, or gives reasons he is not satisfied with. Under s.551(3) the name is then published in the Gazette, and on that publication the company is dissolved.

Total elapsed time is longer than 60 days in practice, because SSM’s internal review and the tax-clearance step sit outside those clocks. But the statutory windows are 30 days each, and if you are the objector, that is the deadline that matters.

On what grounds can someone object?

Section 552(1) gives six grounds, and any person may use them within 30 days of the date specified in the notice:

  • the company is still carrying on business, or there is other reason for it to continue;
  • the company is a party to legal proceedings;
  • the company is in receivership or liquidation, or both;
  • the objector is a creditor, a member, or a person with an undischarged claim;
  • the objector believes there is a derivative action worth pursuing under Division 6 of Part III; or
  • for any other reason it would not be just and equitable to remove the company.

Section 552(2) defines when a claim stops being undischarged: it has been paid in full, or paid in full or part by a receiver or liquidator in a completed process, or the receiver or liquidator has told the creditor there are not enough assets. For members, it is payment of a surplus-asset entitlement, or notification that there is no surplus.

The Registrar cannot proceed unless satisfied under s.552(3) that the objection was withdrawn, the facts behind it are no longer correct, or it is frivolous and vexatious — and he must notify both the objector and the company either way.

Dissolution does not end liability

This is the misconception that costs the most money.

Section 554(1)(a) provides that on striking off, the company is dissolved but the liability of every director, officer and member “continues and may be enforced as if the company had not been dissolved”. Section 554(1)(b) preserves the Court’s power to wind up a struck-off company where there is proof it has realisable property — in which case s.554(2) limits the liquidator’s job to discovering and realising those assets.

Separately, s.556 lets the Registrar act for a dissolved company where some purely administrative act still has to be done. Striking off is an administrative tidy-up of the register. It is not a discharge.

The seven-year reinstatement window under section 555

Almost no commercial guide covers this, and it is the single most useful thing to know if you are on the receiving end of a striking off.

Any person who is aggrieved by the Registrar’s decision has seven years from the date the name was struck off to apply to the Court to reinstate it (s.555(1)). Seven years — not six months, not the objection window.

The test in s.555(2) has two limbs. The Court may order reinstatement if satisfied that the company was, at the time of the striking off, carrying on business or in operation, or, alternatively, that it is otherwise just that the name be reinstated. That second limb is deliberately open, and it is the one a creditor uses when the company was genuinely dormant but was struck off with a claim still outstanding. The Court may also give directions to place the company and everyone else as nearly as possible in the position they would have been in.

Section 555(3) is the sting. Once an office copy of the order is lodged with the Registrar, the company is deemed to have continued in existence as if its name had never been struck off. Annual returns that were never filed were still due. Directors who thought they were finished in year two find out in year six that they never were.

Practically, this means two things. If you are a creditor and your debtor vanished from the register, you have a route, and it runs for seven years. If you are a director, “we struck it off years ago” is not a closed chapter until the seven years have run.

What happened to the 2025 moratorium?

Between 16 April and 30 September 2025 SSM ran a striking-off moratorium under a separate set of guidelines. During that window applicants did not have to submit the shareholders’ resolution (though they still had to obtain consent), and outstanding compounds against the company and its directors attracted a 95% reduction.

That window has closed. No successor moratorium appears in SSM’s legal framework library as at July 2026. Anyone quoting the relaxed resolution requirement or the compound discount today is quoting an expired concession.

Common mistakes

  • Distributing the remaining cash, then applying. That is a return of capital under paragraph 5(h) and it routes you into a members’ voluntary winding up. Deal with the capital through the correct mechanism first.
  • Forgetting a discharged charge. Loans repaid years ago often sit unsatisfied in the Register of Charges because nobody lodged the s.360 notice. Condition (c) is checked against the register, not against your bank statement.
  • Applying before tax clearance. Paragraph 5(e) requires clearance before filing where the company traded. Filing first and clearing later is the most common cause of a stalled application.
  • Assuming a struck-off company is safely gone. Section 554 keeps liability alive and s.555 keeps the register entry restorable for seven years.
  • Treating a holding company as dormant. Holding one share in a subsidiary makes it a holding company under paragraph 5(i), whatever its trading history.
  • Relying on the 2025 moratorium terms. They expired on 30 September 2025.

What’s next

Run the ten conditions as a checklist before you spend anything. If conditions (b), (h) or (i) fail, you are looking at a members’ voluntary winding up, not a strike-off — and the earlier you accept that, the less you spend on a rejected application. If the company cannot pay its debts in full, neither route is open to you and the page you need is creditors’ voluntary winding up. And if a company you are owed money by has already been struck off, count seven years from the striking-off date and take advice on a s.555 application before that window closes.

Frequently asked 5
How long does a striking off take in Malaysia?

The Act sets two 30-day clocks, not one long one. Under section 551(1) the Registrar may serve a notice giving the company 30 days to show cause, then publishes a notification to the public. Under section 551(2) he may strike the name off 30 days after that publication. Dissolution happens when the name is published in the Gazette under section 551(3). SSM does not publish a service standard for the whole process, so treat any quoted month range as an estimate rather than a rule.

Can a struck-off company be brought back?

Yes. Section 555(1) gives any person aggrieved by the Registrar's decision seven years from the striking off to apply to the Court for reinstatement. The Court must be satisfied that the company was carrying on business or in operation at the time, or that reinstatement is otherwise just. Once an office copy of the order is lodged with the Registrar, section 555(3) deems the company to have continued in existence as if it had never been struck off.

Do directors stop being liable once the company is struck off?

No. Section 554(1)(a) says the liability of every director, officer and member continues and may be enforced as if the company had not been dissolved. Section 554(1)(b) also preserves the Court's power to wind the company up if there is proof it has realisable property. Striking off closes the register entry, not the exposure.

Can a holding company be struck off?

Not under the guidelines. Paragraph 5(i) of SSM's striking-off guidelines states that a holding company should instead commence a voluntary winding up. A dormant subsidiary can be struck off, but paragraph 6 adds conditions — a consent letter from the holding company for a wholly-owned subsidiary, or from all shareholders otherwise, plus a declaration that neither company is under investigation or prosecution.

What if a shareholder cannot be traced?

The application can still be submitted. Paragraph 5(a) of the guidelines allows it where the requisite majority cannot be obtained because a shareholder is untraceable, provided attempts were made by registered post to the residential address in the Registrar's records, and proof of those attempts is attached.

Sources & history 4 sources
⚑ Awaiting expert verification

The following are deliberately unstated or described only qualitatively until confirmed by a subject-matter expert:

  • SSM publishes no service standard for the total elapsed time of a section 550 striking off — any month range should be treated as observed practice, not a published commitment
  • Whether SSM has issued a further striking-off moratorium after the 16 April to 30 September 2025 window — none was found in the SSM legal framework library as at July 2026
  • Whether the tax clearance practice referenced in paragraph 5(e) of the guidelines is now handled through a specific LHDN form or portal step should be confirmed with LHDN before relying on a stated turnaround

Sources

  1. Companies Act 2016 (Act 777), reprint as at 1 August 2022, ss.549–556 — SSM
  2. Guidelines on Application by Directors or Members to Strike Off the Name of a Company under Section 550 of the Companies Act 2016 — SSM
  3. Guidelines for the Application to Strike a Company Off the Register under Section 550 during the Moratorium Period from 16 April 2025 to 30 September 2025 — SSM
  4. Practice Directive 1/2017 (Revised 1 October 2024) — late lodgement penalties and prescribed forms — SSM

Change history

Version Date Change By
01.00 20 Jul 2026 Approved and published.
More in Restructuring & closure View all 6 →
Related knowledge