# SUHAKAM: The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia > Entity page for SUHAKAM — Malaysia's national human rights body established under the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 (Act 597): its four core functions, its investigative powers, how complaints are handled, and the limits imposed by the statute itself. - Category: government - Language: en - Status: published - Updated: 2026-08-01 - Canonical: https://negaraku.md/en/government/suhakam-human-rights-commission --- When someone submits a complaint of a human rights violation to SUHAKAM, what exactly can and cannot the commission do? The answer is not rhetoric — it lies in a brief 1999 act that sets out precisely four functions, a line of investigative powers, and a few red lines that may not be crossed. ## At a glance | | | | --- | --- | | Full name | Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) | | Type | National human rights institution; body corporate (Section 3) | | Establishing statute | Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 (Act 597) | | Royal Assent | 27 August 1999 | | Gazetted | 9 September 1999 | | Came into force | 20 April 2000 (PU(B) 122/2000) | | Latest major amendment | Act A1714 2024 (gazetted 27 June 2024) | | Website | `suhakam.org.my` | SUHAKAM is an independent body corporate — it may sue and be sued in its own name — but it is not a court and not an enforcement authority. Its role is to investigate, recommend and report. ## What does "human rights" mean under this act? This is the point most often misunderstood. Section 2 of Act 597 defines "human rights" specifically as *the fundamental liberties as enshrined in Part II of the Federal Constitution*. So SUHAKAM's first point of reference is always the country's own constitution — rights such as liberty of the person, equality, freedom of speech, assembly and religion. Section 4(4) adds a second layer: for the purposes of this act, regard shall be had to the *Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948* to the extent that it is not inconsistent with the Federal Constitution. International standards are taken into account, but the Constitution still prevails. ## What are its four core functions? Section 4(1) lists four functions — no more, no fewer: - **(a) Awareness and education** — to promote awareness of and provide education relating to human rights. - **(b) Legislative advice** — to advise and assist the Government in formulating legislation, directives and administrative procedures, and to recommend the necessary measures to be taken. - **(c) International treaty recommendations** — to recommend to the Government with regard to the subscription or accession of treaties and other international instruments in the field of human rights. - **(d) Complaint investigation** — to inquire into complaints regarding infringements of human rights as referred to in Section 12. ## What powers support those functions? Section 4(2) gives SUHAKAM a list of powers to carry out those functions. Among the most important in practical terms: | Power (Section 4(2)) | Practical meaning | | --- | --- | | (a) Research and programmes | Conducting seminars, workshops, studies and disseminating the results | | (b) Advice on complaints | Advising the Government/authorities about complaints against them and recommending appropriate measures | | (c) Study and confirm violations | Investigating and confirming human rights violations in accordance with the act | | (d) Visiting places of detention | Visiting any place of detention, institution and other place, and making recommendations | | (e) Public statements | Issuing public statements on human rights when necessary | | (f) Other appropriate activities | Undertaking any other activity necessary in accordance with any written law | The power to visit places of detention (Section 4(2)(d)) was strengthened by the 2024 amendment: the new Section 4(3) states that such a visit **may not be refused** by the person responsible for the place concerned, so long as the procedures prescribed by law or guidelines are complied with. The same amendment also added a specific mechanism for receiving and acting on complaints from children (Section 4(2)(ea)). ## Who are the commissioners, and how are they appointed? Under Section 5, SUHAKAM consists of **not fewer than seven and not more than twenty** members. They are appointed by the **Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the recommendation of the Prime Minister**, who before tendering his advice must consult the committee under Section 11A. The 2024 amendment sharpened the membership requirements: - **Section 5(3A)** — the membership must include at least one representative of persons with disabilities (OKU) and at least 30 per cent women representatives. - **Section 5(3B)** — anyone who is active in politics and registered with any political party may not be appointed as a member. The term of office is **three years**, and a member is eligible for reappointment **once only** for a further three-year term (Section 5(4)). The Chairman is designated by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong from among the members (Section 6), while the Vice-Chairman is elected by the members among themselves. The 2024 amendment also created the post of **Chief Children's Commissioner** and two **Children's Commissioners** (Section 6A) to handle human rights matters relating to children. ## How does the complaint and investigation process work? Part III of the act (Sections 12–15) governs inquiries. SUHAKAM may inquire **on its own motion** or on a **complaint** by an aggrieved person, a group of persons, or someone acting on their behalf (Section 12(1)). For inquiries, Section 14 gives SUHAKAM powers resembling those of a tribunal: summoning any person resident in Malaysia to attend to give evidence or produce documents, taking evidence on oath, and even receiving evidence that may not be admissible under the Evidence Act 1950. Section 15 protects witnesses with the same privileges as witnesses in court. But these powers have their limits. Where an inquiry does **not** disclose a violation, SUHAKAM records that finding and informs the complainant (Section 13(1)). Where an inquiry **does** disclose a violation, SUHAKAM may refer the matter to the relevant authority with the necessary recommendations (Section 13(2)) — and since the 2024 amendment, that authority is **required to inform** SUHAKAM of the action taken (Section 13(3)). ## What limits does the statute itself impose? Three important limits make SUHAKAM an investigative and advisory body, not a punitive one: 1. **It cannot overlap with the courts.** Section 12(2) prohibits SUHAKAM from investigating a complaint that is pending before a court (including an appeal) or that has been finally determined. If a matter enters court while an inquiry is under way, SUHAKAM must cease immediately (Section 12(3)). 2. **Recommendations are not binding.** The act gives SUHAKAM the power to recommend and report, not to enforce. It depends on the Government and Parliament to act. 3. **No foreign funds.** Section 19(2) prohibits SUHAKAM from accepting any foreign funds; a narrow exception under Section 19(3) only allows unconditional funds for the purpose of human rights education and awareness. The Government is required to provide adequate funds each year (Section 19(1)). ## How does it report and maintain its independence? Section 21 requires SUHAKAM to table an **annual report** to Parliament on all its activities, no later than the first meeting of Parliament in the following year, complete with a list of matters referred to it and the action taken. It may also table special reports whenever necessary. As a statutory body, its accounts are subject to the Statutory Bodies (Accounts and Annual Reports) Act 1980 (Section 20). SUHAKAM's independence is also measured from the outside. Through Media Statement No. 32-2026 dated 9 June 2026, SUHAKAM announced that the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) under the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), at its 47th Session, had re-confirmed SUHAKAM's **"A" status** accreditation — the highest status, reflecting continued compliance with the Paris Principles, the international standard governing the independence, effectiveness, pluralism and mandate of national human rights institutions. (The date 9 June 2026 is the date of SUHAKAM's announcement; the actual date of the SCA session's decision has not been confirmed in this source.) "A" status enables SUHAKAM to participate fully in UN human rights mechanisms, including the Human Rights Council. ## What's next If you want to file a complaint, start by checking two things: whether the issue falls within the fundamental liberties of Part II of the Federal Constitution (the Section 2 definition), and whether it is being, or has been, tried in court (the Section 12(2) limit). To understand the rights that form the basis of SUHAKAM's mandate, read the fundamental liberties provisions in the [Federal Constitution](/law/federal-constitution). To see how its annual report is scrutinised, refer to the role of [Parliament](/government/parliament). Verify the current complaint forms and channels at `suhakam.org.my` before you act. ## Sources - Akta 597 — Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 (teks penuh) — https://suhakam.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ACT-597-1999_English.pdf (Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)) - Akta A1714 — Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2024 — https://suhakam.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SUHAKAM-ACT-AMENDMENT_2024.pdf (Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)) - About Us — SUHAKAM — https://suhakam.org.my/about-us/ (Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)) - Media Statement No. 32-2026 — SUHAKAM Welcomes Re-Accreditation as an 'A Status' NHRI (menyebut Sesi ke-47 SCA) — https://suhakam.org.my/2026/06/media-statement-no-32-2026_suhakam-welcomes-re-accreditation-as-an-a-status-national-human-rights-institution/ (Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)) --- Source of truth: https://github.com/negaraku-md/NegaraKu.md License: CC BY-SA 4.0