# Resigning as a Company Secretary in Malaysia

> How a company secretary resigns under s.237, the 30-day clock, and the s.237(2) route out when the directors cannot be contacted.

- Category: company-secretary
- Language: en
- Status: published
- Updated: 2026-07-20
- Canonical: https://negaraku.md/en/company-secretary/secretary-resignation

---

Every guide to this topic is written from the company's side: your secretary
resigned, here is what you file. That is the wrong audience. The person actually
searching at 11pm is the secretary who wants out of a client that has stopped
answering emails, stopped paying, and will certainly not be lodging anything
with SSM on their behalf.

Section 237 of the Companies Act 2016 was drafted for exactly that person, and
it works even when the company does nothing at all.

## The ordinary route: notice to the Board

Section 237(1) provides that, subject to the constitution or the terms of
appointment, a secretary may resign from office by giving a notice to the Board.

Note what is absent. There is no acceptance, no board resolution approving the
departure, no requirement that fees be settled first. It is a unilateral act.

Section 237(3)(a) then fixes when it bites. The secretary ceases to hold office
on the expiry of **30 days from the date of the notice**, or the period
specified in the constitution or the terms of appointment, whichever governs.
Practice Note 4/2018 restates the three possibilities:

| Cessation trigger | Source |
| --- | --- |
| Expiry of the period specified in the constitution | Constitution |
| Expiry of the notification period in the terms of appointment | Engagement letter |
| Expiry of 30 days from the date of notice to the Board | s.237(1) default |

The Board can shorten the period. Practice Note 4/2018 confirms the directors
may bring the term of office to an end earlier than the stipulated notice
period, **if the secretary agrees**, by lodging a s.58 notification. What they
cannot do is stretch it, or hold the resignation hostage.

## The escape route when nobody answers: s.237(2)

This is the provision that makes s.237 genuinely useful, and the one almost no
competitor page explains properly.

Section 237(2) provides that if none of the directors of the company can be
communicated with at the last known residential address, the secretary may
notify the Registrar of that fact and of their intention to resign. Section
237(3)(b) then ends the appointment on the expiry of 30 days from the date of
that notice to the Registrar.

The company is bypassed entirely. SSM is told directly, and the clock runs.

### What SSM requires as evidence

Practice Note 4/2018 states the notice must be accompanied with supporting
evidence that none of the directors can be communicated with — for example,
proof of returned correspondence addressed to the directors. SSM's own FAQ adds
two refinements that decide most real cases:

- **Email alone is not the primary evidence.** A copy of an email can be used as
  an *additional* supporting document if the secretary can prove that email was
  their usual medium of communication with the directors.
- **Proof of receipt defeats the route.** SSM has been explicit: if there is
  proof of receipt of the notice of resignation served on the director by
  registered letter, the secretary **cannot** resign through s.237(2), because
  the directors are still contactable.

That last point is the trap. A returned, undelivered registered letter is the
evidence you want. A signed acknowledgement of delivery is evidence you have to
use s.237(1) instead — and wait out the 30 days.

## Protecting yourself when the company will not file

Resignation under s.237 ends your office. It does not update SSM's records. The
duty to notify the Registrar within 14 days that a person has ceased to be
secretary sits on the *company* under s.58(1)(e), and a company that has stopped
responding to you is unlikely to discharge it.

SSM confirms the consequence plainly: the secretary's name is still displayed on
the company's corporate profile until the resignation is updated by the company
under s.58.

Practice Note 4/2018 provides the countermeasure. A secretary who has resigned
under s.237(1) **may lodge a copy of the notice with the Registrar**,
accompanied by a declaration in the form appended to the Practice Note, if they
take the view that their resignation may not be notified to the Registrar. The
form is titled *Declaration by Secretary to Cease Office* and is expressed to be
under s.237(3)(a). It records the company's particulars, the secretary's
particulars including licence or membership number and SSM practising
certificate number, the date of cessation, and which of the three cessation
triggers applies.

Once lodged, that document is made available to any person on payment of the
prescribed fee. Your resignation becomes part of the searchable record even
though the corporate profile still shows your name.

**If you take one procedural step from this page, it is this one.** It costs a
form and a fee, and it is the difference between having resigned and being able
to prove you resigned.

## What you must stop doing on day 31

Practice Note 4/2018 is unambiguous: the secretary is no longer allowed to lodge
any document on behalf of the company or the directors after ceasing to be the
secretary of the company.

Secretarial firms routinely get this wrong out of habit or goodwill — finishing
an annual return that was already in progress, filing a change of address for a
client who has just left. After cessation you are not the company's officer, and
lodging in that capacity is not a favour, it is a misrepresentation to the
Registrar.

## Resignation does not close your file

Section 237(4) preserves liability. Nothing in s.237(1) or (2) relieves the
secretary from liability for any act or omission done **before** the secretary
vacated office.

Registers left inaccurate, a return lodged with wrong particulars, minutes never
written up during your tenure — the resignation does not travel back in time.
This is a practical argument for completing the handover properly rather than
walking away on day 30, and for keeping your own copies of what you filed.

There is a second exposure worth naming. If your practising certificate lapses
while you are still named as secretary of companies, s.238(1)(c) disqualifies
you automatically, and SSM's Guidelines require an active appointment during the
preceding certificate period for renewal. Resigning from every appointment and
then letting the certificate run out is a route to having to make a fresh s.241
application under a new certificate number.

## What the company must do once you go

If you were the only secretary, your departure creates a vacancy, and s.240
provides that the office shall not be left vacant for more than 30 days at any
one time. Practice Note 4/2018 puts it directly: where the resigning secretary
is the only secretary, the appointment of a new secretary must be effected
within 30 days from the day the office becomes vacant.

That obligation belongs to the company and its directors. It is not yours, and
it does not extend your notice period. Directors sometimes argue the outgoing
secretary must stay until a replacement is found; s.237 contains no such
requirement.

## Common mistakes

- **Waiting for the company to accept the resignation.** Section 237(1) requires
  notice, not consent. The 30 days run either way.
- **Reaching for s.237(2) because the directors are ignoring you.** Being
  ignored is not the same as being uncontactable. If the notice was received,
  SSM will not accept the s.237(2) route.
- **Relying on emails as the sole evidence under s.237(2).** SSM treats email as
  additional support, and only where it was the usual medium of communication.
- **Assuming SSM updates the register when you resign.** It does not. Until the
  company lodges under s.58, your name stays on the corporate profile.
- **Skipping the Practice Note 4/2018 declaration.** It is the only self-help
  step available to a s.237(1) resigner facing a company that will not file.
- **Continuing to lodge documents during a handover.** After cessation you have
  no authority to lodge anything for that company.
- **Treating resignation as a clean break from past filings.** Section 237(4)
  says otherwise.

## What's next

If you are the company rather than the departing secretary, the replacement
clock under s.240 starts the day the office falls vacant, and directors carry
the exposure. If a replacement is already lined up, the handover of registers,
minute books and system access is the part that determines whether the incoming
secretary can actually do the job.

## Sources

- Companies Act 2016 (Act 777), reprint as at 1 August 2022 — https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Legal_Framework/Document/Companies%20Act%202016_Akta%20777_BI%20(1.8.2022).pdf (SSM)
- Practice Note No. 4/2018 — Procedures on Resignation of Secretary under Section 237 — https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Legal_Framework/Document/PN4-2018_(BI).pdf (SSM)
- FAQ Part K — Registration of Secretary — https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Legal_Framework/Document/Part%20K.pdf (SSM)
- Notice of Intention to Vacate the Office of Secretary — Section 237(2) — https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Legal_Framework/PDF%20Tab%202/46_notice_of_intention_to_vacate_the_office_of_secretary-s2372.pdf (SSM)
- FAQ Part R — Practising Certificate (amendments to the 2025 Guidelines) — https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Legal_Framework/Document/FAQ%20-%20PINDAAN%20KE%20ATAS%20GARIS%20PANDUAN%20PC%202025_FINAL.pdf (SSM)

---
Source of truth: https://github.com/negaraku-md/NegaraKu.md
License: CC BY-SA 4.0