# Arbitration or Court? Choosing a Dispute Clause Under Malaysian Law

> What choosing arbitration under the Arbitration Act 2005 and the AIAC Arbitration Rules 2026 actually buys, what it costs, and the appeal right Malaysia deleted in 2018.

- Category: business
- Language: en
- Status: published
- Updated: 2026-07-20
- Canonical: https://negaraku.md/en/business/arbitration-vs-litigation-malaysia

---

The arbitration clause is usually the last clause negotiated and the first one that matters
when things break. Most Malaysian templates still carry a clause drafted on an assumption
that stopped being true in 2018: that a losing party can take a point of law to the High
Court.

It cannot. Sections 42 and 43 of the Arbitration Act 2005 were deleted by the Arbitration
(Amendment) (No. 2) Act 2018 (Act A1569). Choosing arbitration in Malaysia today means
choosing finality, whether or not you meant to.

## What the Act actually gives you

**A hard door.** Section 8 provides that no court shall intervene in matters governed by
the Act except where the Act so provides. Section 10(1) then makes a stay of court
proceedings **mandatory** where a party applies before taking any other step, unless the
arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed. The
timing matters — file a defence first and the right to a stay may be gone.

**A written agreement, generously defined.** Section 9(3) requires writing, but s.9(4)
treats the requirement as met if the content is recorded in any form even where the
contract was concluded orally or by conduct, and s.9(4A) accepts electronic communication.

**Party control over law and seat.** Section 30(1) directs the tribunal to apply the rules of
law chosen by the parties; s.30(3) treats a choice of a legal system as a choice of its
substantive law, not its conflict rules. Section 22 leaves the seat to the parties, and to
the tribunal failing agreement.

**Domestic and international are not the same regime.** Under s.3(2), a domestic arbitration
seated in Malaysia gets Parts I, II and IV **and** Part III unless the parties opt out. Under
s.3(3), an international arbitration seated in Malaysia gets Part III only if the parties
opt in. Part III is where consolidation (s.40), the preliminary point of law (s.41),
confidentiality (s.41A) and costs (s.44) sit — so an opt-out has consequences well beyond
what the parties usually intend.

**Confidentiality by statute.** Section 41A prohibits publishing, disclosing or communicating
information relating to the proceedings or the award, with exceptions for pursuing or
defending legal rights, complying with an obligation owed to a government or regulatory
body or court, and disclosure to advisers. Section 41B keeps related court proceedings out
of open court unless the court orders otherwise.

**Enforceability across borders.** Section 38 allows an award, whether seated in Malaysia or
made in a foreign State party to the New York Convention, to be recognised and enforced by
entry as a judgment. Section 39 confines refusal to the Convention grounds. A Malaysian
court judgment does not travel nearly as well.

## What you give up

Finality cuts both ways. Section 37 permits setting aside only for incapacity, an invalid
arbitration agreement, want of proper notice or inability to present a case, an award
outside the submission, irregular composition or procedure, non-arbitrability, or conflict
with the public policy of Malaysia — which s.37(2) defines to include fraud, corruption and
breach of natural justice. The application must be made within **ninety days** of receipt of
the award (s.37(4)), except where fraud or corruption is alleged (s.37(5)).

You also give up the court's default machinery. There is no free judge, no automatic
summary judgment, no writ of seizure and sale. You pay the tribunal, the institution and the
venue, and you still have to go to the High Court to enforce.

## What the AIAC Rules 2026 add

The AIAC Arbitration Rules 2026 took effect on **1 January 2026** and, by paragraph C of the
Guideline and Application, displace all previous editions unless the parties agree
otherwise; paragraph D preserves the earlier edition for arbitrations already commenced.
The separate AIAC Fast Track Arbitration Rules are now folded in as the Fast Track
Procedure.

The provisions that most often decide the choice:

| Feature | Rule | Effect |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Fast Track Procedure | 7 | Available by agreement, where the claim is under USD3,000,000 international or RM2,000,000 domestic, or on exceptional urgency; sole arbitrator, documents-only, award within six months of constitution |
| Summary determination | 9 | Disposal of claims or defences without a full hearing |
| Emergency arbitrator | 12–14 | Interim relief before the tribunal exists |
| Default seat | 29.2 | Kuala Lumpur, unless the tribunal determines otherwise |
| Default language | 30.2 | English |
| Third-party funding | 31 | Disclosure obligations |
| Technical review | 42 | Draft award submitted to the AIAC Court within 90 days of closure of proceedings, before signature |

Section 11 of the Act remains available alongside the Rules: a party may apply to the High
Court for interim measures before or during the arbitration, including preservation of
assets and security for costs.

## Common mistakes

**Drafting an appeal right into the clause.** There is nothing to appeal to. Sections 42 and
43 are gone.

**Opting out of Part III in a domestic contract without reading it.** You lose statutory
confidentiality under s.41A along with consolidation and the costs regime.

**Leaving the seat unstated and assuming it does not matter.** The seat determines the
supervisory court and the setting-aside jurisdiction. Under AIAC Rule 29.2 it defaults to
Kuala Lumpur — which may be exactly right, or exactly wrong.

**Assuming limitation does not apply.** Section 30(1) of the Limitation Act 1953 applies the
Act and other limitation laws to arbitrations as they apply to court actions.

**Taking a step in the court action before applying for a stay.** Section 10(1) requires the
application to be made before any other step in the proceedings.

## What's next

If the amount in dispute is modest and the debtor is Malaysian, the court route with its
fixed monetary tiers is usually cheaper and the enforcement machinery is stronger. If the
counterparty is offshore, the New York Convention is the decisive argument for arbitration.
Either way, decide before signing — s.10(1) makes the clause very hard to escape afterwards.

## Sources

- Arbitration Act 2005 (Act 646), reprint as at 1 November 2018 — https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1700445_BI/Act%20646%20%28REPRINT%202018%29.pdf (Attorney General's Chambers of Malaysia)
- AIAC Arbitration Rules 2026 — https://admin.aiac.world/uploads/ckupload/ckupload_20251229031919_71.pdf (Asian International Arbitration Centre)
- AIAC — Arbitration — https://www.aiac.world/Arbitration-Arbitration (Asian International Arbitration Centre)
- Limitation Act 1953 (Act 254), online version as at 1 September 2019 — https://lom.agc.gov.my/ilims/upload/portal/akta/outputaktap/1727530_BI/ACT%20254-Online%20version%20as%20at%201%20Sept%202019%20%282%29.pdf (Attorney General's Chambers of Malaysia)

---
Source of truth: https://github.com/negaraku-md/NegaraKu.md
License: CC BY-SA 4.0