# MPERS (2025): What Changes for Private Entities in 2027

> A section-by-section walkthrough of MPERS (2025), the revised private entity reporting standard effective 1 January 2027, including the deletion of the property development guidance in Section 34.

- Category: accounting
- Language: en
- Status: published
- Updated: 2026-08-14
- Canonical: https://negaraku.md/en/accounting/mpers-2025-revision

---

If you are a Malaysian property developer reporting under MPERS, the single most
important accounting fact of the next two years is that the guidance you have been
using since 2016 is being deleted.

MASB issued MPERS (2025) on 10 October 2025. It applies to annual periods beginning
on or after 1 January 2027, with early application permitted. In the process it
removes the Malaysian property development accounting guidance that occupied the
back half of Section 34 — paragraph 34.1 is amended and paragraphs 34.17 to 34.60
are deleted — on the reasoning that a rewritten Section 23 built on the IFRS 15
revenue model makes separate development guidance unnecessary.

That is a real transition for a large, cash-heavy slice of the Malaysian private
company population, and it currently has almost no plain-language coverage. Most of
what exists is either a Big 4 alert aimed at listed groups or a one-paragraph
"MPERS has been updated" note. This page is the walkthrough.

## What exactly did MASB issue, and when?

| Item | Detail |
| --- | --- |
| Standard | Malaysian Private Entities Reporting Standard (2025) |
| Issued by | Malaysian Accounting Standards Board |
| Date of issue | 10 October 2025 |
| Effective | Annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027 |
| Early application | Permitted |
| Replaces | MPERS (2016), which ceases to apply for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027 |
| Derived from | The third edition of the IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard, issued by the IASB in February 2025 |
| Malaysian departures | Scope, applicability and nomenclature |

The framing matters. MASB has not written a Malaysian standard from scratch. It has
adopted the IASB's third edition and adjusted the scope and naming so it fits the
Malaysian private entity definition. Everything else in the Standard is the
international text. That is good news for anyone who has to research a technical
question: the IASB's own supporting material for the third edition is directly
relevant to MPERS (2025), which was not always true of earlier Malaysian versions.

MASB issued MPERS (2025) alongside amendments to MFRS 19 *Subsidiaries without
Public Accountability: Disclosures*, which shares the same 1 January 2027 effective
date. Read together, 2027 is the year Malaysia resets reporting for the entire
non-listed population — the MPERS entities directly, and the MFRS 19 entities
through the reduced-disclosure route.

## Why the property development guidance disappeared

MPERS (2016) carried a distinctly Malaysian feature. Section 34 *Specialised
Activities* housed a long block of guidance on accounting for property development
activities, running from paragraph 34.17 to paragraph 34.60. It existed because
Malaysian developers sell under a statutory sell-then-build regime and the
international IFRS for SMEs text did not address the pattern directly. That block
told developers when and how to recognise development revenue and costs, and how to
present development work in progress.

MPERS (2025) removes it. MASB's stated reasoning is straightforward: because the
revenue section has been aligned with the IFRS 15 model, the previous property
development guidance is no longer required.

What replaces it is not silence. It is Section 23 *Revenue from Contracts with
Customers*, which now works the way MFRS 15 does. Under that model a developer does
not start from a categorical rule about property development. It asks whether the
performance obligation is satisfied over time, applying the criteria in Section 23,
and recognises revenue accordingly. The over-time recognition principle is reflected
in paragraph 23.54(c) of the revised text.

For many Malaysian residential developments the answer will still be over time,
because the developer's performance creates an asset the customer controls as it is
created, or creates an asset with no alternative use plus an enforceable right to
payment for performance completed to date. But that answer now has to be *reached*,
contract by contract, rather than assumed from the activity type. Two consequences
follow.

**First, it becomes a documentation exercise.** The auditor will expect a written
assessment of the over-time criteria against the sale and purchase agreement terms,
not a reference to a section number. Where a project has non-standard terms — joint
ventures, deferred payment schemes, bulk sales to an investor, mixed commercial and
residential phases — the analysis can land differently across phases of the same
development.

**Second, the measure of progress becomes a policy choice with disclosure
consequences.** Section 23 requires a single method of measuring progress for each
performance obligation, applied consistently. Cost-to-cost is the common choice, but
it is a choice, and it must be disclosed and justified.

## The section-by-section change log

MPERS (2025) keeps the 35-section architecture. Section numbers have not shifted,
which makes the mapping easier than it could have been. What changed is the content
of individual sections, and in two places the identity of a section number.

| Section | Title in MPERS (2025) | What changed |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Private Entities | Malaysian scope section; retains the private entity eligibility test |
| 2 | Concepts and Pervasive Principles | Updated to reflect the revised conceptual thinking in full IFRS Accounting Standards |
| 3–8 | Presentation, position, comprehensive income, changes in equity, cash flows, notes | Consequential and drafting updates |
| 9 | Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements | Substantively revised; MASB names it as a key area overhauled |
| 10 | Accounting Policies, Estimates and Errors | Aligned to the revised definition of accounting estimates |
| 11 | Financial Instruments | **Merged.** All financial instrument requirements now sit in one section |
| 12 | **Fair Value Measurement** | **New section.** Previously *Other Financial Instruments Issues*; fair value requirements are consolidated here |
| 13–18 | Inventories, associates, joint arrangements, investment property, PPE, intangibles | Section 15 becomes *Joint Arrangements*; other changes are targeted |
| 19 | Business Combinations and Goodwill | Substantively revised; contingent consideration and acquisition cost treatment move toward the MFRS 3 position |
| 20–22 | Leases, provisions and contingencies, liabilities and equity | Targeted amendments |
| 23 | **Revenue from Contracts with Customers** | **Rewritten** on the IFRS 15 contract-based model; over-time recognition in paragraph 23.54(c) |
| 24–33 | Government grants through related party disclosures | Targeted amendments, including income tax in Section 29 |
| 34 | Specialised Activities | **Property development guidance deleted.** Paragraph 34.1 amended, paragraphs 34.17 to 34.60 deleted |
| 35 | Transition to the Standard | Governs first-time adoption of the Standard itself |

MASB's own summary names six areas as the substance of the revision: conceptual
foundations and pervasive principles, consolidated and separate financial
statements, financial instruments, fair value measurement, business combinations and
goodwill, and revenue.

### The three changes most likely to bite a normal trading company

Most MPERS entities are not developers. For them, the practical exposure is narrower
but not zero.

**Section 11, financial instruments.** The old split between *Basic Financial
Instruments* and *Other Financial Instruments Issues* is gone; there is now a single
Section 11. Anyone with intercompany loans on non-market terms, director's advances,
convertible instruments or foreign-currency payables should expect the classification
analysis to be re-performed rather than rolled forward.

**Section 12, fair value measurement.** This is genuinely new as a standalone
section. MPERS (2016) scattered fair value guidance across the sections that used
it. Pulling it together makes the requirements more visible — which in practice
means more visible to your auditor. Investment property carried at fair value,
biological assets, and share-based payments are the usual places this surfaces.

**Section 19, business combinations and goodwill.** If you have acquired a business
and deferred part of the consideration on an earn-out, the direction of travel is
toward measuring contingent consideration at fair value where that can be done
without undue cost or effort, and toward expensing acquisition-related costs rather
than capitalising them into the cost of the combination. Both are MFRS 3 positions.

**Section 9, consolidated and separate financial statements**, is the fourth to
watch, and it catches a specific Malaysian pattern: the family group where one
Sdn Bhd holds shares in several others without ever having prepared consolidated
accounts, on the view that the subsidiaries are small. Consolidation is driven by
control, not by size, and a revised Section 9 is the moment an auditor is most
likely to revisit an inherited assumption. If your group has never consolidated,
establish now whether it should have been — the answer determines whether the 2027
transition is a change of standard or a correction of a prior period error, and
those are very different conversations to have with a lender.

### What has not changed

Worth stating plainly, because it is where most of the fear sits. MPERS (2025) does
not introduce lessee balance sheet recognition on the MFRS 16 model, and does not
introduce an expected credit loss model on the MFRS 9 model. The IASB declined to
align leases with IFRS 16 in the third edition on complexity and cost grounds, and
retained the incurred loss model for impairment of financial assets measured at
amortised cost. MASB adopted that edition. If you have been told that MPERS entities
must now capitalise every operating lease, ask for the paragraph.

## The 2027 collision, and why the real deadline is 2026

MFRS 18 *Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements* also takes effect for
annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027. That is not a coincidence of
scheduling so much as a coincidence of the international standard-setting cycle, but
it lands on Malaysian groups all the same.

A group with a listed or regulated parent on MFRS and private trading subsidiaries
on MPERS is running two separate transitions through one finance function in one
reporting cycle. The parent is re-cutting its profit or loss into five categories
with two mandatory subtotals. The subsidiaries are re-analysing revenue contracts
and financial instruments. The group reporting pack sits between them.

The deadline that actually governs your work is earlier than 2027. Both transitions
are retrospective, so comparatives are restated. For a 31 December year end:

| Milestone | Date |
| --- | --- |
| Start capturing data on the new basis | 1 January 2026 |
| Comparative year end | 31 December 2026 |
| First MPERS (2025) reporting period | 1 January to 31 December 2027 |
| First audited MPERS (2025) financial statements circulated | Within 6 months of 31 December 2027, under s.258 of the Companies Act 2016 |

If you have a 30 June year end, the first MPERS (2025) period is the year ending
30 June 2028, and the comparative year begins 1 July 2026. Non-December year ends
buy time on the reporting date but not much on the data-capture date.

## What to do in the next six months

1. **Classify yourself.** Confirm you are still a private entity under the MASB
   definition and are not caught by a Securities Commission or Bank Negara filing
   obligation, directly or through a parent, associate or joint venture. If you are
   caught, the MPERS question is moot and you are on a different transition.
2. **Inventory your revenue contracts by type.** Not by customer. By contractual
   pattern — sell-then-build residential, construction contract, milestone-based
   service, subscription, point-of-sale goods. Section 23 analysis is done at that
   level.
3. **For developers, pull the SPAs for every live project.** The over-time criteria
   are assessed against the actual terms, including the enforceable right to payment
   for performance to date on termination. This is the clause that decides the
   answer, and it varies between standard-form and negotiated agreements.
4. **List every financial instrument that is not a plain trade receivable or bank
   loan.** Intercompany balances, director's accounts, related-party loans without
   stated interest, financial guarantees given to a bank on behalf of a group
   company.
5. **Identify every balance measured at fair value** and confirm you can support the
   measurement under a Section 12 framework rather than an ad hoc valuation.
6. **Talk to your auditor before the comparative year starts, not after.** A change
   of accounting policy discovered during the 2027 audit costs a restatement; the
   same change discovered in 2026 costs a conversation.

## Common mistakes

- **Reading "effective 2027" as "nothing to do until 2027."** Retrospective
  application means the comparative period is prepared on the new basis. For a
  December year end the work starts in January 2026.
- **Assuming property development revenue recognition is unchanged in substance.**
  Many projects will still recognise revenue over time — but under Section 23 that
  is a conclusion supported by contract analysis, not a rule you can cite. Auditors
  will ask for the analysis.
- **Treating MPERS (2025) as an optional upgrade.** MPERS (2016) ceases to apply for
  periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027. The only choice is whether you adopt
  early.
- **Confusing MPERS (2025) with MFRS 18.** They are different frameworks. MFRS 18
  does not apply to an MPERS entity, and MPERS (2025) does not apply to an MFRS
  entity. A group can be running both.
- **Assuming the change also resets your audit exemption position.** It does not.
  Audit exemption is governed by SSM Practice Directive 10/2024 and its own phased
  thresholds, which run on a separate track from the reporting framework.
- **Citing MPERS section numbers from a 2016 copy of the Standard.** Sections 11 and
  12 have effectively swapped roles, and Section 34 no longer says what it used to.
  Old references will read as correct and be wrong.

## What's next

Two questions usually follow this one. If you are unsure whether MPERS applies to
your company at all, start with the framework decision and the private entity test.
If a change in ownership, a listing plan or a regulated parent means you are moving
off MPERS entirely, the mechanics of that move — the trigger, the MFRS 1 first-time
adoption restatement, and whether the change can be reversed — are a separate
problem with its own timetable, and it does not wait for 2027.

## Sources

- MPERS (2025) — https://www.masb.org.my/pages.php?id=615 (MASB)
- MASB launches revised Malaysian Private Entities Reporting Standard (MPERS) — https://www.masb.org.my/press_list.php?id=490 (MASB)
- MASB issues amendments to the disclosure standard and a major multi-section update to MPERS — https://www.masb.org.my/press_list.php?id=489 (MASB)
- MASB Exposure Draft 80 Malaysian Private Entities Reporting Standard (MPERS) — https://www.masb.org.my/press.php?id=479 (MASB)
- MASB Approved Accounting Standards for Private Entities — https://www.masb.org.my/pages.php?id=20 (MASB)
- IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard, third edition — https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2025/issued/html-ifrs-for-smes.html (IFRS Foundation)
- MASB Exposure Draft 80 — Malaysian Private Entities Reporting Standard (MPERS), full version — https://mail.masb.org.my/pdf_file/MASB%20ED80-MPERS-Full%20version.pdf (MASB)
- MPERS 2025: What are the Changes and its Implications (CPD brochure) — https://www.micpa.com.my/v2/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/CPDFeb_MPERS-2025.pdf (MICPA)
- IASB issues third edition of IFRS for SMEs accounting standard (transition reliefs) — https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/technical/ifrs-technical-resources/documents/en-gl-iasb-issues-third-edition-of-ifrs-for-smes-accounting-standard-03-2025.pdf (EY / IFRS Foundation)
- Overview of the Third Edition of IFRS for SMEs Accounting Standard — https://www.at-mia.my/2025/09/30/overview-of-the-third-edition-of-ifrs-for-smes-accounting-standard/ (Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA))

---
Source of truth: https://github.com/negaraku-md/NegaraKu.md
License: CC BY-SA 4.0